There isn’t a revenue number that automatically means a company needs a full-time CFO. One business at $8 million may be navigating a complex raise and multiple entities; another at $30 million may need stronger accounting operations before it needs an executive finance leader.
A better question is: what work needs to happen every week, and what level of judgment does it require?
Look at the decision load
A full-time CFO often becomes valuable when the company is making several high-stakes decisions at once: expanding into new markets, taking on debt, changing pricing, acquiring a business or preparing for a capital raise. The common thread is not simply more transactions. It is a growing need to connect operating choices to capital, risk and long-term direction.
Ask whether leadership needs a finance executive in planning meetings, investor conversations and strategic tradeoffs—not only someone to produce reporting after the fact.
Separate leadership from process
If the close is slow, reconciliations are inconsistent or no one owns the budget, those problems matter. But they may first call for an experienced controller, a stronger accounting partner or a focused cleanup. Hiring a CFO to compensate for a fragile close is expensive, and it makes the executive role harder than it needs to be.
A fractional CFO can help establish reliable reporting and clarify what the next finance hire should own. That creates a better brief for a permanent leader instead of hiring around today’s pain.
Make the role sustainable
Before opening a search, write down the work only an executive can do, the cadence it requires and how it will change over the next 18 months. If the list is full and durable, a full-time hire may be the right step. If the need is concentrated around a raise, a planning cycle or a systems reset, a time-bounded engagement could be more sensible.
The right moment is when the business needs ongoing executive judgment—and can give that leader the information and authority to use it well.
← Back to all writing